I came across an interesting article that criticizes individuals who offset their carbon emissions with the planting of trees, that was linked to on the MSN portal page.
The article mentions the fact many researchers feel that the method of planting trees to offset carbon emissions is only a marginal solution to helping curb the problem of global warming. This practice of helping to put an end to global warming is likened to “… the medieval practice of selling indulgences to wash away sins: It may feel good, but it doesn’t solve much.”
While celebrities like Leonardo DiCaprio & Al Gore follow this plant-a-tree methodology, one wonders if these celebrities should set a better example by reducing their emissions even further. I’m reminded of an article I read a while back when Al Gore visited Toronto. The author of the particular article was quick to chide Gore on his use of a limo to get to the venue (as opposed to say a bicycle, public transit or some sort of hybrid motor vehicle). I realize that some of these alternatives may be a tad farfetched, given that he is a public figure, and his safety is of concern.
The other point in this article about planting trees that critics are quick to point out is that different trees absorb different amounts of carbon. John Kadyszewski of Winrock International, a nonprofit that works on environmental projects states: “Trees are all different and the amount of carbon in the tree depends on how old it is and where it’s growing and what kind of tree it is.” So, while planting trees is good for the environment, the effects of doing so may not be seen for many years.
Other critics point out that planting trees is a good band-aid solution, but that it may take focus away from what’s really needed, which is technological advancement and changes in our day-to-day behaviour i.e. consuming less (be it electricity, clothing, food, etc.), using alternate forms of transportation (such as taking public transport, walking, or cycling to & from work), or recycling/composting just to name a few ways.
There are many positives and negatives associated with this ‘solution’ to help stop global warming. One thing the critics can agree on – doing something like this, is better than doing nothing at all.
Follow this link to read the article in its entirety.
